Alfred Sturtevant and George Beadle Untangle Inversions.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Great articles often begin with an intriguing paradox, describe an elegant experimental approach, provide lasting and important data, and change the course of their discipline. Sturtevant and Beadle (1936) meets all of those criteria and stands as a paradigm for the genetic analysis of chromosome behavior in Drosophila. It began with two paradoxes, both ofwhichwere vexing but not obviously connected. First, females heterozygous for paracentric inversions, which do not include the centromere, failed to produce progeny bearing single crossovers within the inversion but did produce progeny bearing double crossovers. There was no change in the number of eggs hatched, ruling out inviability of eggs containing single crossover chromosomes as an explanation. Second, although such females only rarely produced progeny bearing two maternal X chromosomes, they frequently produced progeny with no maternal X chromosomes (patroclinous males). How was inversion heterozygosity producing such an odd set of meiotic anomalies? Sturtevant and Beadle demonstrated that single crossovers did indeedoccurwithin the inverted segmentsby characterizing crossing over in attached-X chromosomes, where both the normal X and its inversion-bearing homolog were attached to a single centromere. The arms of attached-X chromosomes (being homologs) undergo pairing and crossing over. These authors found that the occurrence of single crossovers within the inverted region in such chromosomes generated ring-X chromosomes at expected frequencies for the larger inversions and substantial frequencies for the smaller ones. These observations led Sturtevant and Beadle to conclude that in the inversion heterozygotes, “. . .single crossover chromatids are selectively eliminated during themeiotic process.” But how? And is that “selective elimination” tied to the production of those patroclinous exceptions? Sturtevant and Beadle proposed that themechanism for selective elimination lay in the fact that meiosis in Drosophila involves only nuclear division within the oocyte—no cell division occurs (Huettner 1924). The four meiotic nuclei are arranged in a row perpendicular to the egg cortex. Only the innermost nucleus participates in fertilization; the other three are eliminated. A single crossover within a paracentric inversion generates two (noncrossover) parental types and two recombinant products: one acentric fragment lacking a centromere and a complementary dicentric chromosome with a chromatin bridge connecting twohomologous centromeres. The acentric fragment cannot attach to the meiotic spindle and is lost, but what becomes of the dicentric chromosome and the two nonrecombinant chromatids that compose themeiotic tetrad? Sturtevant and Beadle proposed that
منابع مشابه
CHROMOSOME INVERSIONS AND MEIOSIS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER By G. W. BEADLE AND A. H. STURTEVANT
متن کامل
The Relations of Inversions in the X Chromosome of Drosophila Melanogaster to Crossing over and Disjunction.
CONTENTS Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554 Inversions studied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 555 Inversion scute-4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
متن کاملAlfred Henry Sturtevant
Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences.
متن کاملAlfred Henry Sturtevant (1891?1970)
Alfred Henry Sturtevant studied heredity in fruit flies in the US throughout the twentieth century. From 1910 to 1928, Sturtevant worked in Thomas Hunt Morgan?s research lab in New York City, New York. Sturtevant, Morgan, and other researchers established that chromosomes play a role in the inheritance of traits. In 1913, as an undergraduate, Sturtevant created one of the earliest genetic maps ...
متن کاملA positive correlation between crossing over within heterozygous pericentric inversions and reduced egg hatch of Drosophila females.
XTENSIVE chromosomal polymorphism, probably due to pericentric inverE sions, has been reported in animals as dissimilar as grasshoppers (WHITE 1958) and mice ( OHNO et al. 1966). Inversion polymorphism is also prevalent in natural populations of many Drosophila species, but rarely are the inversions pericentric. The infrequency with which pericentric as compared with paracentric inversions are ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Genetics
دوره 203 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016